The problem it solves
A well-equipped organisation has an EDR, a SIEM, identity protection, a mail filter and a network gateway. Each is excellent within its own scope, and each is blind to what the others can see. The analyst then spends the day joining the dots by hand: opening five consoles, copying an IP address from one into another, and deciding with whatever could be gathered in time. It is this joining work — not the detection — that consumes the hours and lets incidents slip through.
The two mechanisms
Inter-enrichment
An alert raised in one tool is automatically completed with what every other tool knows: the identity context of the account involved, the intelligence verdict on the addresses seen, the machine's network history, the messages received in the same window. The analyst receives a qualified incident, not a line to investigate.
Inter-remediation
The response is no longer confined to the tool that detected. A confirmed compromise triggers, in one move, isolation of the endpoint, revocation of directory sessions, blocking of the indicator at the gateway and quarantine of the related messages. One decision, an entire chain.
A shared memory
What was decided on one incident stays available for the next, whichever tool it comes from. The same false positives are not requalified every fortnight.
A single audit trail
Every enrichment and every action carries its origin and its timestamp. On audit day you produce one timeline, not five exports to reconcile.
Why « meta »
It is not one more security tool in the stack, it is the layer that sits above it. It detects nothing itself and replaces no product: it makes the ones you already have work together, including the ones you will keep after changing vendor. That is also what keeps the stack replaceable brick by brick, instead of locking you into a single supplier.
What it changes for a CISO
The question is no longer « do I have the right tools » but « how long between the signal and the action ». A SOC whose tools do not talk to each other measures that delay in hours, because it depends on a human being available to join the dots. With inter-enrichment and inter-remediation it is measured in minutes, and it no longer depends on who is on call.
Frequently asked questions
- Do we have to change our tools to benefit from it?
- No, quite the opposite: the layer exists to make the ones you already have work together. Connection happens through the interfaces of the products in place.
- Does the orchestration decide on its own to isolate a machine?
- Only within the scope you have pre-authorised, defined when the service goes live. Outside that scope it prepares the decision and waits for an analyst to approve.
- What happens if one tool in the chain is unavailable?
- Actions that depend on it are queued and flagged rather than silently lost. A missing enrichment is shown as such on the incident.
Other solutions we operate.
- EDRCrowdStrike
Falcon — Endpoint Detection & Response
Detection and response on endpoints, the foundation of any defence chain. One lightweight agent, one console, and the ability to isolate a machine before the attacker spreads.
- ITPCrowdStrike
Falcon Identity Threat Protection
Monitoring of Active Directory and cloud directories: privilege escalation, forgotten service accounts, abnormal authentication, and conditional blocking in real time.
- SIEMCrowdStrike
Falcon Next-Gen SIEM
The collection and correlation platform that brings together endpoint, identity, cloud and third-party data, and on which our analysts work every day.
A question? A project?
Our security specialists are available to you. A NextGen-SOC demonstration, an audit, or simply a conversation — start here.